He said that every organization is facing and the periphery has its own challenges. Chief Justice Chandrachud said, “Fake news in the present society is a serious threat to the engagement and vibrancy of the press. It is the collective responsibility of the sine qua non as well as the partnership to keep away any division or bias during the process of accountability…fake news can be delivered to millions of people at once and would be contrary to the fundamental principles of democracy Which are creating ambiguity for our existence.
Chandrachud termed responsible journalism as the engine that propels democracy towards a better future. He said, “Responsible journalism acts like an engine that takes democracy towards a better tomorrow. Journalist, fair, responsible and fearless journalism is more important than ever in the digital age.” Referring to the Emergency period when the Indian Express newspaper had left the editorial page blank, Chief Justice Chandrachud said it was necessary to remember How powerful silence can be.
Random Chandrachud said, “Working and healthy democracy always promotes the development of journalism as an institution which can ask important questions from work or in simple language can say ‘truth in front of power’.” ‘ Any democracy brokered is compromised when the press is prevented from doing so. The press should remain free for the democratic life of the country. Chandrachud said that 25 June 1975 was an important moment in our history.
“A declaration (of emergency) defines and redefines freedom and the various concepts it stands for and how vulnerable it can be…,” the chief justice said, adding that truth and There is a need to bridge the gap between lies and become a bridge. “Fake news has the potential to create tension between communities, therefore putting our democratic values at risk,” he said.
The Chief Justice said that Paparazzi and everyone (or judges like him) have some things in common. He said that both believe that “the pen is mightier than the sword”. Newspapers have historically been a download for social and political authority. There was an incident. In India, the lighting and subsequent coverage of the Nirbhaya rape case by some people in Delhi resulted in mass media protests and subsequent criminal law reforms.
Ghatiya Chandrachud said, “As a citizen it is possible that we may not agree with the stand taken or the conclusion drawn by the paparazzi. I also associate with many Paparashi. After all, who is it that everyone agrees with? But it should not turn into disagreement and hatred should not be allowed to direct into violence.
read this also-
(Apart from the headline, this news has not been contested by the ANDITV team, it has been published directly from the syndicate.)