New Delhi: State-Run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), which claims an order book of Rs 1.84 lakh crore, has gone against it as an aggressively gone which labels as “Armachair Critics with” malicious intentions, one of its helicopters after an event.
Its sharp response to important reports and its pieces has triggered a backlash, reminiscent of the aerospace giants, saying that criticism is not enemy – but is a sycophancy.
Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) at Aviation Major Porbandar is disturbed by the report and analysis of the Dhruv accident, which led to the grounding of the entire copter fleet by the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard, which is subject to finding and fixing the issue.
It is discovered that investigators have not yet been determined the root cause of the accident, killing two Indian coast guards and an aircraft diver in January. The fleet has a shock to the grounding services and the Coast Guard, which simultaneously operates about 330 of these work horses.
“HAL would like to bring all kinds of notices of all its stakeholders, media and publications – online, print, website, social and digital media platforms etc., since the Indian Coast Guard operated by the Indian Coast Guard in January, after the unfortunate accident of the ALH operated by the Indian Coast Guard in January, betting and stories with malic intentions on HAL have been written and published on these platforms.
Hal said, “These stories are written by so-called defense analysts, former pilots, defense forces officials and arm-chair critics,” Hail said in a series of posts on ‘X’, these stories are written without offering its perspective, and arguments are unilateral and bothered.
He said, “There are inaccurate and references for older issues that have long been solved by HAL by taking their customers into confidence. HAL cannot feed or comment on all these reports due to the sensitive nature of defense issues and products,” said this.
The state -run unit stated that these stories “can damage the interests of the stakeholders of HAL and therefore, this statement is being filed to protect the interests of all our stakeholders from being impressed and influenced by speculative stories”.
Former Navy Eviator and Test Pilot Commander KP Sanjeev Kumar (retired) responded to ‘X’ to HAL, saying that if you “welcome criticism to the interests of the stakeholders, work with greater transparency, stops having habitat about shooting and malafied intentions of messengers”.
He said, “Your worst critic is not your enemy; the way a cheat is not your best friend. Learn to difference,” he said.
Kumar wrote in 2020 in 2020, when former Navy chief Admiral Arun Prakash (retired) criticized HAL, “rejected it with a caustic comment that” talking to retired persons and giving endless comments “.
“HAL is lucky to receive preservation from MOD/DDP. Any other company must have closed by the competition by now. In Seattle, independent journalists and small media houses bring Boeing into heels. You are a blackhole for facts, reporters are parrots to your briefs. Still you complain?”
Former Navy Pilot wrote an article on an accident on his blog which was later re -exposed by Theprint.
Rear Admiral Sudhir Pillai (retired), a naval helicopter aviator, said that HAL’s media release is not an explanation, “This is a classic case of institutional gaslighting. Reject criticism. Discover the criticism. Damn the issues. Discriminate the issues”.
“The statement labels defense analysts, pre-pilots and service officers as ‘so-called experts’ and ‘arm-chair critics’. Translation: If you are not doing our line, your experience is not counted,” he said.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also read: Porbandar Chopper Crash was identified, Dhruva fleet to stay at least 3 more weeks