War, a missing United Nations
The countries of West Asia appear to be burning one after the other, which leads to a million dollars. Where is the United Nations? What is it doing? The issue of an Israel-Filistine has now become an Israel-Iran issue. It almost appears as if the United Nations, Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency has entrusted Israel to stop Iran’s nuclear program and to stop the war war against it. The threats of wars that spread and disrupt life around the world are lost on these agencies. The United Nations seems to have become a modern day Nero. In ‘New World Order’, there is no role for peace.
EV Tulsi Rao,
Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh
Now when Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katj has openly said that Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei can no longer be allowed to come into existence, Iran can make it a serious challenge and attack Israel with all its powerful force.
Israel does not want to end war. The bombing of the Gaza strip causes total destruction, indicating its purpose of desire to create a Jewish state.
It is the primary duty of the United Nations to intervene and try to bring a dialogue between all warning countries.
Parthasarathi n.
Chennai
It seems that there is no end to the struggle–Ukraine war, Hamas attack on Israel and vengeance by Israel, and now, Israel-Iran war. The influence of these wars has severely affected trade and raw prices, thus affecting the economy of many countries. Is it surprising that the United Nations has inability to intervene. The United Nations may lose its identity.
MRG Murthy,
Mysore
Withdrawal, optimism
There is a joyous report amidst the very disturbing news from West Asia-successful withdrawal of Indian students from warriors (pages, “” 110 students from war-torn Iran land in New Delhi, through Armenia “, 20 June). My eyes were caught that many students were Kashmiri students, and were waving the tricolor when they reached New Delhi. This increases optimism that for a long time, disgruntled youth of Kashmir are now taking a step to eliminate themselves for the Indian Republic.
Nalini Vijayaraghavan,
Thiruvananthapuram
Not for intolerance
The firm of India’s Supreme Court of India confirms the rights of film-makers and theater owners, as seen in its direction for the Karnataka government to ensure the screening of the thug life, it is more commendable. In a democracy, artistic freedom should not be held hostage by violence or dangers of mob pressure. By underlining the duties of the state to protect valid expression, the court has not only defended cinema, but has also upheld the rule of law. Such decisions strengthen the backbone of free speech and remind us that intolerance should never determine what the public can see or not.
Of. Chidnand Kumar,
Bengaluru
Published – June 21, 2025 12:24 AM IST