“The way she has ignited sentiments in the entire country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” the bench said.
“The way she has ignited sentiments in the entire country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” the bench said.
The Supreme Court on Friday lashed out at the former BJP spokesperson. Nupur SharmaWho? Alleged remarks made against Prophet Muhammad In a televised debate, she said that she was single-handedly responsible for the ensuing protest and should have apologized to the nation.
because of comments Violence, unrest, sabotage and a flurry of arrests in many states.
“The way she has ignited sentiments across the country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” Justice Surya Kant, heading the vacation bench of Justice JB Pardiwala, said orally.
Ms Sharma had approached the Supreme Court to club several First Information Reports (FIRs) registered across the country.
The court refused to entertain her plea stating that “the conscience of the court is not satisfied”, following which Ms Sharma withdrew her petition.
The court said Ms Sharma’s remarks were “disturbing”.
“What’s his business for making these comments?” The bench asked his counsel, senior advocate Maninder Singh.
When Mr Singh said his client had apologised, the court lashed out saying he should have been back on air and apologized to the country.
“It was too late to take them back… and that too, they took back their remarks conditionally, ‘if sentiments are hurt'”, the Supreme Court remarked.
The court said that the purpose of these statements was to incite.
“Petition [to club the FIRs] Smells of his arrogance, that the magistrates of the country are too small for him… If you are the spokesperson of a party, there is no license to say such things. If the argument is misused, he should have first filed an FIR against the anchor”, the court said.
Nupur Sharma should have apologized to the nation: Supreme Court
“The way she has ignited sentiments in the entire country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” the bench said.
“The way she has ignited sentiments in the entire country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” the bench said.
The Supreme Court on Friday lashed out at the former BJP spokesperson. Nupur SharmaWho? Alleged remarks made against Prophet Muhammad In a televised debate, she said that she was single-handedly responsible for the ensuing protest and should have apologized to the nation.
because of comments Violence, unrest, sabotage and a flurry of arrests in many states.
“The way she has ignited sentiments across the country… This woman alone is responsible for what is happening in the country,” Justice Surya Kant, heading the vacation bench of Justice JB Pardiwala, said orally.
Ms Sharma had approached the Supreme Court to club several First Information Reports (FIRs) registered across the country.
The court refused to entertain her plea stating that “the conscience of the court is not satisfied”, following which Ms Sharma withdrew her petition.
The court said Ms Sharma’s remarks were “disturbing”.
“What’s his business for making these comments?” The bench asked his counsel, senior advocate Maninder Singh.
When Mr Singh said his client had apologised, the court lashed out saying he should have been back on air and apologized to the country.
“It was too late to take them back… and that too, they took back their remarks conditionally, ‘if sentiments are hurt'”, the Supreme Court remarked.
The court said that the purpose of these statements was to incite.
“Petition [to club the FIRs] Smells of his arrogance, that the magistrates of the country are too small for him… If you are the spokesperson of a party, there is no license to say such things. If the argument is misused, he should have first filed an FIR against the anchor”, the court said.