New Delhi: Pakistan, who on May 7, was “rejected by” Bruceculie “Bruceculie” with a serious response that a serious response was unavoidable and, in offing, may be strict on May 10 to ensure that Thrprint learned to ensure a ceasefire, with a serious response that a serious response was unavoidable.
But what exactly did these 72 hours change?
“India sent a clear message that no matter whether India could fulfill traditional attacks anywhere in Pakistan. Pakistan learned that if necessary, India could launch a barrage of missiles and not only was used at this time. The message was very clear for Pakistanis,” a source in Indian. , Defense and Safety Foundation told ThePrint.
Show full article
ThePrint has also known that Pakistan Air Force (PAF) lost at least some aircraft between 8 and 10 May.
Air Marshal Ak Bharti, Director General of Air Operations, publicly stated that the Pakistani aircraft was hit and technical analysis is being done, after which the armed forces will share more details.
Asked if the Indian Air Force (IAF) shot Pakistani aircraft, he said that “their aircraft were prevented from entering our border … Surely, we have dropped some aircraft … of course, of course, there are disadvantages in their favor we have provoked.”
He said that the exact number is with IAF, but it is still there Analysis of technical details And will soon come out with a report.
IAF has also said that the details of their own losses will be made public in the appointed time. However, all the pilots are accounted for
Theprint is stopping the information made by India so far and the operation is still going on due to the damage done to Pakistan and will wait for IAF. To formally release details.
Although even IAF finalizes its report based on technical and visual evidence, ThePrint has learned that the strikes were very deep and wider than the two sides have officially claimed.
Sources said that India does not want OPS to be about sindoor claims and counter claims and hence it is very careful about the information that is publicly excluding it.
This is directly contrary to the strategy of the Pakistan Army which claimed a lot without any evidence. Pakistan also demonstrated fake satellite images to show damage on the Indian side, but found Call By international experts.
IAF, it is learned, does not wish to tell anything, which can be questioned due to immediate lack of tangible evidence such as what happened after the Balkot Strike when suspicion was raised on the limit of loss.
For example, during the strike on terrorist camps On May 7, in Pakistan and POK, India used missiles such as Crystal Labyrinth, which for the second time the video really on the video, as appeared in one of the videos released by the Indian Ministry of Defense.
Nearly all strikes of May 7 were covered by high-resolution reconnaissance reconnaissance unmanned air vehicles and post damage satellite paintings,
All strike posts for May 7, India only claimed the video, of which only were shot by the public and shared on social media, or for which clear satellite images are available. There are some other attacks that Pakistan has not clearly claimed nor India.
Talking about operations, sources also said that a lot of talk can be talked about Chinese Air-to-air missile PL-15. Not a single hit score.
On the other hand, IAF used a host of aircraft and air defense systems from May 7, with major failures for PAF from 8 May.
The early part of Operation Sindoor focused on nine terrorist camps, which were evacuated by the IAF and the military, which strikes with the number of major casualties on the terrorist infrastructure.
Sources said that since May 8, the strike focused on showing the real raw power of the IAF to the Pakistani defense establishment.
A pile of missiles, the muting mutation by IAF was used by IAF to strike back into the Pakistani Army.
It is discovered that several Chinese-supply headquarters-9B long-range air defense systems and headquarters-16 medium-ranged air defense systems were taken by Haropi and Harop Littering Munishan-The word “drone” in use with IAF also caught the world’s fancy in a conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
Government of India had It was formally stated last Friday The Indian Army “sidelined and blocked the China-supplied air defense systems of Pakistan”, beaten up with the fact that a deep journey inside Pakistan to travel deep inside Pakistan to get close to Pakistan’s army.
The missiles fired by IAF include BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, which were removed from the air of Pakistan (both air and ground versions in IAF), scalp long-range air-to-two-ground missiles, hammer air-to-knur missiles, rampage air-to-ground missiles and 2000.
The Indian medium-ranges surface-to-hwa missile system (Srimam is also known as Barak 8) and Swadeshi Akash also saw action, and so did the S-400.
A source said, “It was a joint blow and amazing operation using long -range missiles, air defense missiles, using mutation and strikes on specific sites, causing widespread damage to Pakistani military forces, which forced them to look for a ceasefire on the fourth day,” a source said.
Pakistan Air Force property was maximum damaged on the ground, which was through missile strikes at its primary logistics hub, Noor Khan Base in Rawalpindi and Bholari Air Base. On the Pakistani news channel, PAF Air Marshal Masood Akhtar (Rit) said that he was aware that an airborn early warning and control system (AEV and C) were destroyed when India was destroyed when India killed Hanger in Bholari.
It is firmly learned that the actual disadvantage can be higher than in Pakistan, shown officially and informally.
Pakistan operates 9 Saab ERE and two IL 78 mid-air refuelrs.
Incidentally, Pakistan has also named five PAF personnel who say that Bholari was killed in a strike at the airport.
Sources said it was on the morning of 10 December, when India hit PAF’s locations in Chaklala, Rafriki, Rahim Yaar Khan, Sargodha, Bhulli, and Jacobabad, the DGMO of Pakistan made a frenzy call to its Indian counterpart, which was a brief.
A source said, “On May 7, when our DGMO wanted to talk, they stopped it from taking vengeance. On May 10, they became strict. It clearly shows that the message was distributed heavy in Pakistan,” a source said.
Pakistan’s PM Shahbaz Sharif while addressing an event on Friday said that “at around 2.30 pm on May 10, General Syed Asim Munir called me to a safe line and informed me that India’s ballistic missiles have killed Noor Khan Airbase and other areas”.
Incidentally, it was then when Pakistan was looking for a ceasefire.
As Air Marshal Bharti said earlier, “Have we achieved our military objectives?”
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also read: Operation Sindor is a springboard in new belief in Make in India Weapons in India