NIshikant Dubey has done everything to be in the Power Click -RSS background of the Bharatiya Janata Party, who is the winner with four consecutive terms in the Lok Sabha, a great loyalty to fierce Hindutva advocate, fiery orator, estut politicians, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Emit Shah.
He considers policy making and government’s policy-gratitude better than most ministers. And he likes to take from Sonia and Rahul Gandhi to Mahua Motra, who is from the opposition camp. This is his timely side as a politician. Personally, I also praise him for being a lovely family person. I have seen him sitting on a stage bench for hours at New Delhi railway station, waiting for his son to return from school. That path was back.
Usually, even half of these qualities should convert a leader into a large league in the BJP. Nishikant Dubey should curse his bad luck. Modi and Shah love their aggression and put it in front of the Lok Sabha and Parliamentary Committees, whenever the government needs to keep the opposition down. But he really did not find what he is entitled to his bravery efforts – perhaps a minister berth or a large organizational position.
Show full article
A career-defined moment
Nishikant Dubey’s attack on Supreme Court and Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is probably a career-defined moment for him. Especially because BJP President JP Nadda chose to issue a statement, Dismiss the party From Godda MP’s comment.
Dubey has every reason to be happy about it, however. Such disturbances by the BJP are not much frequently, followed with awards. Remember Jirraj Singh’s April 2014 Comments Tell people to return Modi or go to Pakistan? He was made the Minister of State a few months later. Lion He made headlines again In 2015, when he asked if the Congress had accepted the leadership of Rajiv Gandhi’s wife, he married “a Nigerian woman and a white skinned woman” like Sonia Gandhi.
Many including Nigerian messengers in New Delhi took its exception. The BJP again removed itself from Singh. However, a few years later, he was elevated as a minister with independent allegations. Singh, who never stopped with his controversial and communal polarization comments, was made a full cabinet minister in 2019. He continues to make headlines with controversial statements, even if most people do not even remember the name of Textile Minister.
Look at another case- Nitesh Rane, MLA son of former Union Minister Narayan Rane. In September 2024, Nitesh, a BJP MLA, Threatened to enter a mosque And kill Muslims “one by one by one”. The BJP removed itself from them, saying that such comments have no place in public life.
About three months later, he was a cabinet minister in the Devendra Fadnavis -led government.
There is a long list of BJP leaders, who removed themselves after controversial statements, only for rewarding them later. Nishikant Dubey has finally joined this prestigious list.
What do you think what was Nadda’s message to Dubi? Check it X handle of letterDubey has not removed the ANI video clip where he is attacking the CJI and the Supreme Court. In fact, a few hours after the NADDA message, Dubey opened a new front, stating that the former Chief Election Commissioner SY Qureshi Was “Muslim” Irut ” No more “Election income ” (Muslim Commissioner, not Election Commissioner). Do not be wrong. Godda MP party will do nothing against high command wishes. The message he received from Nad’s statement was clearly different from the people.
A BJP leader who attacked the judiciary should not come as surprise. Memorization Arun jaitley Saying that Indian democracy “cannot have a atrocities of disinterest?” The Supreme Court killed the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC).
Many of his colleagues including the then Law Minister Ravi Shankar PrasadAttacked the Supreme Court on the collegium system.
Therefore, Nishikant Dubey is only following the footsteps of his more luxurious party colleagues. Just that he took CJI Khanna and took it far away Responsible for “Civil War” In the country.
Also read: Tharoor Rahul has a misfit in the Congress. Why the outspoken leaders are on the margin on all sides
Global trends
There is nothing unique about a powerful, major ruling party who attacked the judiciary. This is keeping in mind the global instinct. See how the army -backed government in Pakistan is trying Reject judiciaryPakistani Parliament has passed a law Virtually empowers the Prime Minister To select CJP.
And see how Donald Trump Administration has been Attack on judges and judiciary To thwart their plans.
Check this title in Mentor – “Disregarding Trump’s court orders is testing the fence of rule of law.” American publication is full of them.
Turkish President Recep Taip Erdogan has continued to attack the judiciary, even though it has been done later play alongAllegedly enabled him to arrest those who gave his political challenges. He is even after being “pure” 4,000 judges Between 2016 and 2019.
In Italy, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been on a warpath against judges and prosecutors. Victor Orban has a similar tendency in Hungary, Donald Tusk Poland, etc. These are all countries which are ruled by the powerful and popular heads of governments, who are clear that political authorities should rule any institution – judiciary or whatever it is.
China’s highest People’s Court can be a good model for him as it is fine with being under the Communist Party of China. In 2017, the country’s top judge, Chief Justice Jhou Kiang warned against judicial freedom, asked Chinese courts to oppose “Western views” which threatens the CPC leadership.
“The courts of the people at all levels should disregard the wrong Western perceptions including constitutional democracy and the separation of powers”, Jhou Kiang said In the meeting of Supreme People’s Court in 2017. Nothing has changed since then.
Back home, why is Nishikant Dubey so upset with the Supreme Court? Why do they think CJI Sanjeev Khanna is “responsible” for “Civil Wars”? The fact is that Dubey may have their own personal opinion about the judiciary, but they are not taking out their personal groise. Listen to it carefully. He is questioning the court’s decision with long -term implications for BJP politics. To begin, Justice Khanna is leading the bench on the Waqf Act, which raised some possible questions on several important provisions of the revised law. Last December, the CJI-LED bench stopped the courts from passing any effective order or surveys across the country. Existing religious structures,
See other points of criticism of Dubey: Who is the Supreme Court to set a three -month deadline for the Governor or the President of India to decide on the bill passed by the state assemblies? It is an overwhelming majority-if all of the long pending bills were not from non-NDA-ruled states, then it is not a coincidence. One can always question why the President or Governor should have an issue with a time limit to decide on bills. Is the Supreme Court of Land has powers for the President of India to set a deadline, it is a debate issue.
Dubie Other Gruz against Supreme Court Section 377 of the IPC is scraping, which criminalizes homosexuality. Even the RSS was compromising with the court order. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said that LGBTQIA+ community was the “very part” of society.
The issues raised by Nishikant Dubey and the merits of his arguments are not material in the context. The fact is that he is only giving voice to his party’s concerns, despite Nad’s public statement. The opposition sees it as an attempt to brobate the highest judiciary which ensures a large extent institutional investigation and balance. However, the Congress also does not have a stellar record when it comes to reducing the judiciary.
As argued above, it is not uncommon to wish a committed judiciary for a major ruling party. Nor is this incident limited to India. My Lords also need to think what the MPs have the courage to take them.
Remember the Supreme Court’s request on making election bond data public? The court played applause to take the government. what happened in the end? The parties, especially those who ruled in the Center and the states, had a final laugh.
There were many examples of companies and individuals giving hundreds of crores of rupees to parties and later getting favorable treatment. The SC could order a court-deafing inquiry at the potential Kwid Pro Quo for those bonds. The court, however, chose it to leave it for public imagination. The way the political executive made fun of SC regime to make the Election Commission autonomous. This is the PM who is handing over almost to the Election Commissioners. Petitions challenging this law which eliminates SC’s decision on it, meanwhile, are pending in the meantime.
There are many other important issues in which SC has not shown any request to decide. They are trapped in acquaintance Tidal (Date after date) cycle. My Lords cannot make a mistake if the latter vaccinations, differences, and even powerful executives see in such laxity signs of reluctance to take.
DK Singh is a political editor in Theprint. He tweets @dksingh73. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)